CO129-290 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [1-4] — Page 459

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

despatch No. 84 of the 5th ultimo.

2. I should, however, be glad to learn why it is not considered desirable to include the provisions of sections 17 and 18 of 33 & 34 Vict. c. 281 and section 3 of 18712. The latter enactment, and chiefly prescribes a fee of $150 for the admission of articled clerks.

I have3 are embodied in this Ordinance; and why, in regards section 21, no reference is made in the Attorney General's report to the previous legislation on the subject of admission to practise which is contained in Ordinance

has been rewritten to:

despatch No. 84 of the
5th ultimis.

2. I should, however, be glad to
beam why
t is not
Considered dessiable
to include the A finor of sections 17 and 18 of
33 and 34 Vict. c. 28'
the other,
amory ofthe Imperial Auf
the
sections parsian which
That one
3 of 1871. Jobswe
thek

refealianecchei
449
that
cheadhy
enactment, and chundy
prescribes a fee of
$150 for the admission of articled
clerks.

I havet.
!
are
embodied ui this
0rduiance; and
why,
regards sechi 21,
no reference
is made in
the Attorney General's refat to the pasion
bgislation of the subject of admission to
practise which is
contained in
Ordinance

to

despatch No. 84 of the 5th ultimo.

2. I should, however, be glad to learn why it is not considered desirable to include the provisions of sections 17 and 18 of 33 & 34 Vict. c. 281 and section 3 of 18712. The latter enactment, and chiefly prescribes a fee of $150 for the admission of articled clerks.

I have to ask why the provisions are embodied in this Ordinance; and why, in regard to section 21, no reference is made in the Attorney General's report to the previous legislation on the subject of admission to practise which is contained in Ordinance

Here is the final output in HTML as requested:

despatch No. 84 of the 5th ultimo.

2. I should, however, be glad to learn why it is not considered desirable to include the provisions of sections 17 and 18 of 33 & 34 Vict. c. 281 and section 3 of 18712. The latter enactment, and chiefly prescribes a fee of $150 for the admission of articled clerks.

I have to ask why the provisions are embodied in this Ordinance; and why, in regard to section 21, no reference is made in the Attorney General's report to the previous legislation on the subject of admission to practise which is contained in Ordinance

Edit History

2026-05-30 14:52:55 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
despatch No. 84 of the 5th ultimo. 2. I should, however, be glad to learn why it is not considered desirable to include the provisions of sections 17 and 18 of 33 & 34 Vict. c. 281 and section 3 of 18712. The latter enactment, and chiefly prescribes a fee of $150 for the admission of articled clerks. I have3 are embodied in this Ordinance; and why, in regards section 21, no reference is made in the Attorney General's report to the previous legislation on the subject of admission to practise which is contained in Ordinance has been rewritten to: despatch No. 84 of the5th ultimis. 2. I should, however, be glad tobeam whyt is notConsidered dessiableto include the A finor of sections 17 and 18 of33 and 34 Vict. c. 28'the other,amory ofthe Imperial Aufthesections parsian whichThat one3 of 1871. Jobswethek refealianecchei449thatcheadhyenactment, and chundyprescribes a fee of$150 for the admission of articledclerks. I havet.!areembodied ui this0rduiance; andwhy,regards sechi 21,no referenceis made inthe Attorney General's refat to the pasionbgislation of the subject of admission topractise which iscontained inOrdinance to despatch No. 84 of the 5th ultimo. 2. I should, however, be glad to learn why it is not considered desirable to include the provisions of sections 17 and 18 of 33 & 34 Vict. c. 281 and section 3 of 18712. The latter enactment, and chiefly prescribes a fee of $150 for the admission of articled clerks. I have to ask why the provisions are embodied in this Ordinance; and why, in regard to section 21, no reference is made in the Attorney General's report to the previous legislation on the subject of admission to practise which is contained in Ordinance Here is the final output in HTML as requested: despatch No. 84 of the 5th ultimo. 2. I should, however, be glad to learn why it is not considered desirable to include the provisions of sections 17 and 18 of 33 & 34 Vict. c. 281 and section 3 of 18712. The latter enactment, and chiefly prescribes a fee of $150 for the admission of articled clerks. I have to ask why the provisions are embodied in this Ordinance; and why, in regard to section 21, no reference is made in the Attorney General's report to the previous legislation on the subject of admission to practise which is contained in Ordinance
Baseline (Original)
desfatch N.. 84 of the 5th ultimis. 2. I should, however, beglad to beam why t is not Considered dessiable to include the A finor of sections 17 and 18 of 33 and 34 Vict. c. 28' the other, amory ofthe Imperial Auf the sections parsian which That one 3 of 1871. Jobswe thek سلجھ refealianecchei 449 that cheadhy enactment, and chundy prescribes a fee of $150 for the admission of articled clerks. I havet. ! are embodied ui this 0rduiance; and why, regards sechi 21, no reference is made in the Attorney General's refat to the pasion bgislation of the subject of admission to practise which is contained in Ordinance
2026-05-30 14:52:55 · Baseline
View content

desfatch N.. 84 of the

5th ultimis.

2. I should,

however, beglad to

beam why

t is not

Considered dessiable

to include the A finor of sections 17 and 18 of

33 and 34 Vict. c. 28'

the other,

amory ofthe Imperial Auf

the

sections parsian which

That one

3 of 1871. Jobswe

thek

سلجھ

refealianecchei

449

that

cheadhy

enactment, and chundy

prescribes a fee of

$150 for the admission of articled

clerks.

I havet.

!

are

embodied ui this

0rduiance; and

why,

regards sechi 21,

no reference

is made in

the Attorney General's refat to the pasion

bgislation of the subject of admission to

practise which is

contained in

Ordinance

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.